APDA in ~60 seconds

The essentials.

2v2
Teams: Government (PM, MG) vs Opposition (LO, MO)
Speeches: 7:30 · 8:30 · 8:30 · 8:30 · 4:30 · 5:30
📜
Case rounds: Gov writes & presents the case; Opp gets 15 minutes to prep after hearing the case statement
🎯
Motions rounds: no one knows beforehand; both teams get 15 minutes to prep from motion reveal
POCs: to be asked during prep time to clarify definitions/mechanism
⚖️
Judging: clear claims, strong warrants, explicit weighing win rounds
Quick check: tap speeches in order

Gov vs Opp - what competing from each side means

Government (Gov)

Your job: propose a fair, winnable case; define terms; explain mechanism; give 2–4 warranted reasons + weighing.

Do
  • Be clear & accessible; stake comparative outcomes.
  • Explain mechanism (who acts, incentives, feasibility).
  • Keep it debatable (avoid tight/spec/truisms).
Avoid
  • Squirrely definitions or unwinnable setups.
  • Thin warrants (taglines without reasons).

Motions rounds: Gov also preps 15 minutes after motion reveal.

Opposition (Opp)

Your job: take the best ground; warrant your responses; weigh early.

Do
  • Group & answer with warrants; find mechanism gaps.
  • Flag tight/spec if needed - keep it minimal and clear.
  • Start the weighing story early.
Avoid
  • Chasing every tag while conceding the center.

Case rounds: Opp gets 15 minutes to prep after the case statement; ask POCs during prep.

How to argue - Claim → Warrants → Impacts

Every winning point has three parts: the Claim you assert, the Warrants (reasons/mechanism) that make it true, and the Impact (why it matters).

Then compare: scope & magnitude, probability, timeframe, reversibility - this is weighing.

Stems: “Our mechanism makes X because Y, which means Z.” · “Even if they achieve X, ours wins on magnitude/probability/timeframe because Y.”

What’s missing?

Roles (click for details)

Prime Minister (PM) - 7:30
  • Define terms; set fair ground.
  • Mechanism: who does what, how it works.
  • 2–4 warranted reasons + initial weighing.
Intro (THBT…) · Definitions/Actors · Mechanism · 2–4 reasons (warranted) · Weighing
Leader of Opposition (LO) - 8:30
  • Frame what matters; take best ground.
  • Group & answer with warrants.
  • Begin weighing vs Gov.
Framework · Topline groups · Key responses (with warrants) · Optional counter-model · Weighing
Member of Government (MG) - 8:30
  • Defend the center; rebuild with warrants.
  • Answer their best lines thoroughly.
  • Collapse; set PMR roadmap.
Group & answer Opp (warranted) · Re-center mechanism/benefits · Weighing narrative for PMR
Member of Opposition (MO) - 8:30
  • Extend Opp’s best offense; ladder voters.
  • Turn/mitigate Gov benefits.
  • Set LOR voters with clear weighing.
Extend offense · Turn/mitigate · Weigh to LOR voters · Roadmap LOR

Rebuttals & Points of Order (POOs)

Rebuttals (LOR/PMR) = collapse + weigh + ballot story. No new arguments.

How to raise a POO

  1. Stand briefly: “Point of order.”
  2. One line: “New argument in rebuttal on [issue].”
  3. Judge rules: “Well taken / Not well taken”; speech resumes.

Etiquette: brief, neutral, respectful.

POO scenarios

Are these valid POOs?

POOs are primarily for procedural violations like new arguments in rebuttals or timing, not constructives like the MO.

HOW TO WIN

  • Pull through your best arguments. Collapse hard.
  • Always warrant. Explain the mechanism; no naked claims.
  • Always weigh. Why your world matters more (magnitude/probability/timeframe/reversibility).
  • Ballot story. “Judge, vote Gov/Opp because…” in one sentence.
Which weighing is stronger?

Flowing & Clash (and spotting drops)

Flow = notes tracing Claim → 1–2 Warrants → Impact. Mark where arguments clash. Call out drops in rebuttals.

Tiny flow exercise: G1 answered, G2 not. Which is the drop?

Partnering 101

Resource management

The 2-minute pact

  • Assign: master flow keeper, timekeeper, POO watcher, case notes.
  • Agree: max 2 passed notes to speaker (missing warrant; weighing line).
  • Set simple signals (speed, finish, move on).

During speeches

  • Speaker talks; partner flows and stars warrants/impacts.
  • Track protected/grace time; mark clash & drops.
  • When roles switch, swap focus but keep one master flow.

15-minute prep: Case rounds → Opp only (after hearing case). Motions → both teams (after motion). POCs during prep clarify definitions/mechanism.

Building a Case

Fair, simple, winnable

Want scaffolding? Use the Case Builder on Practice Tools →

POIs

Equity & Support

PDU is equity-first. If you need support or have concerns, start here.

Glossary (brief)

Click here for more resources →

Flow - notes tracking claims, warrants, impacts
POO - “Point of order”; flags new-in-rebuttal/time issues
⚖️
Weighing - comparing worlds by magnitude, probability, timeframe, reversibility
🧭
Framework - what matters and why
↩︎
Turn - make their argument support your side
Extension - carry an argument forward with deeper warrants
Collapse - focus on the few arguments that win
🧱
Tight - unbeatable Gov case; theory calls check this
🔍
Spec - specific knowledge outside common knowledge/POC
🗳
RFD - judge’s reason for decision
⚔️
Clash - where arguments meet
⬇︎
Drop - unanswered argument

Next steps